BT天堂

The听George and Irina Schaeffer Center for the Study of Genocide, Human Rights and Conflict Prevention听invites you to join our monthly research seminar听Figuring Memory: Social Practices and Collective Transformation, organized听in partnership with the CNRS, the ENS Paris-Saclay, Paris Nanterre University and Sciences Po. Please register using the links at the bottom of this page.

The notion of collective or social memory has compelled substantial scholarly attention as a means for theorizing socially shared meanings and their political and structural consequences. Recently, a field of 鈥渕emory studies鈥� has emerged with journals, conferences, and a lively interdisciplinary exchange. Simultaneously, collective memory has developed an applied, practical, emphasis on producing or consolidating social values and the practice of memory has also compelled substantial social and political engagement. Public and private organizations have invested vast resources in memory practices as a means for teaching social justice, combating prejudice, and preventing future atrocities. Public spaces, museums, sites of atrocity, and classrooms have become sites for remembrance in order to combat prejudice, prevent the repetition of past violence, and instill the values necessary for tolerant and open societies. In all these social spaces, the practice of witnessing is a persistent feature. 听听

The efficacy of memory practices for social betterment is most often taken axiomatically and uncritically as an established fact. Educators, policy makers, and scholars often seem to assume that teaching about past instances of racism, exclusion, and violence will inspire personal and social change. Can teaching about past instances of racism, exclusion, and violence inspire personal and social change? Can narration of the past contribute to transforming society? A robust literature of well-executed studies is still developing and more scholarship is needed in order to answer this question and better understand what is at stake when collective memory is employed in the service of shared values and when such memory practices are, or are not, effective. Furthermore, it is important to investigate if alternative practices might have a greater impact.

The Figuring Memory monthly seminar aims to launch a sustained discussion with scholars and practitioners from multiple disciplines and perspectives engaged with these questions. The seminar takes a comparative perspective, examining past and recent atrocities across the globe and with different motivations and intentions.听

Organizers: Sarah Gensburger, Sandrine Lefranc, Constance P芒ris de Bollardi猫re, and Brian Schiff听

Session 1 with Rebecca Hale | 19 October 2021

"尝别补谤苍颈苍驳听补产辞耻迟听the Holocaust, learning听蹿谤辞尘听the Holocaust: fundamental aims, but how do we know they have been achieved?"

Speaker: Rebecca Hale, Senior Research Fellow at UCL Centre for Holocaust Education

Discussant: Sarah Gensburger, French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS)

This presentation will explore the complexities of studying the impact of Holocaust education, consider the feasibility of using randomized control trials, and appeal to those working in the field to be mindful of making and accepting spurious claims about impact.

Session 2 with Lea David | 16 November 2021

Discussing Lea David's Book听The Past Can鈥檛 Heal Us: The Dangers of Mandating Memory in the Name of Human Rights听

Speaker: Lea David, Assistant Professor, Ad Astra Fellow, School of Sociology, University College Dublin (UCD)

Discussant: C茅cile Jouhanneau, Universit茅 Paul-Val茅ry Montpellier / ART-Dev

Based on evidence from the Western Balkans and Israel/Palestine, Lea David will present her investigation of the relationship between human rights and memory, suggesting that, instead of understanding human rights in a normative fashion, human rights should be treated as an ideology. Conceptualizing human rights as an ideology gives us useful theoretical and methodological tools to recognize the real impact human rights has on the ground. David traces the rise of the global phenomenon that is the human rights memorialization agenda, termed 'Moral Remembrance', and explores what happens once this agenda becomes implemented.

Session 3 with Thomas Van de Putte | 14 December 2021

Cultural Memory from Event to Action

Speaker: Thomas Van de Putte, Post-doctoral Fellow, Trento University

Discussant: Dr. Ewa Tartakowsky, CNRS

Thomas Van de Putte will talk about his recently published book听Contemporary Auschwitz/Oswiecim听(Routledge 2021), an ethnography of a group of friends who live in the contemporary Polish town of Oswiecim, Auschwitz in German. Thomas will address the multiplicity of these people鈥檚 memory performances and use the interactional theories of Erving Goffman and George Herbert Mead to interpret them. But Thomas Van de Putte will also talk about his current research on听Memory and Morality听in educational contexts (at the European level, in Belgium and in Poland), and on developing a theory of听Memory in Action. Van de Putte will outline the main premises of a social theory of cultural memory that borrows from interactionally sensitive forms of cultural sociology, narrative sociolinguistics, and literary reader response theory.

Session 4 with Chana Teeger | 18 January 2022

"Role Playing Racism: History Teaching and the Limits of Experiential Learning"

Speaker: Chana Teeger, London School of Economics

Discussant: Sandrine Lefranc, CNRS

This paper points to the limits of experiential learning when teaching about histories of racism and discrimination. Drawing on fieldwork conducted in a racially diverse South African high school, I document how teachers employed simulations and role playing exercises to teach about apartheid. Teachers argued that these would help build historical empathy. However, not only did the simulations fail to capture the actual costs of being black鈥攐r the privileges of being white鈥� during apartheid, they also reinforced the notion that racial stratification was separate and distinct from students鈥� current situations. Through the simulations, apartheid was presented as a system that has no legacy. Connections were not drawn between the past system and the present context, which students might recognize as real and familiar. The simulations thus ironically served to delegitimize black students鈥� claims about ongoing racism at school and in the broader society.

Session 5 with Dr Tom Pettinger | 15 February 2022

鈥淭emporality and Collective Memory: The Contested Use of Counter-Extremism in 鈥楶ost鈥�-conflict Societies鈥�

Speaker: Dr. Tom Pettinger, University of Warwick

How is violence remembered, why is it remembered in particular ways, and what possibilities does that memory produce? The memory of violence is evident in places scarred by terrorism campaigns, and is manifested by innumerable social practices, from ongoing violence to peace efforts - and by physical infrastructure, like statues, graves, and conflict murals. My research interrogates places where these social practices and physical markers of conflict are evident - particularly Northern Ireland, and also the Western Balkans. What does collective memory of conflict in these places tell us about the reasons violence occurs - and how does this memory intersect with efforts to promote coexistence and peace there?

听

Discussant: Sara Dybris McQuaid (PhD), Aarhus University

Session 6 with Joanna Wawrzyniak | 15 March 2022

鈥淭he Memories of Socio-economic Transformation and the Challenges of the Witnesses' Accounts鈥�

Speaker: Joanna Wawrzyniak, University of Warsaw

In my talk I would like to bring together some aspects of the studies of neoliberalism, memory studies, and postsocialist studies. Through examining how the economic transformation of the 1990s has been remembered in Poland, I want to address three interconnected issues.

Discussant: Constance P芒ris de Bollardi猫re, the George and Irina Schaeffer Center for the Study of Genocide, Human Rights and Conflict Prevention, BT天堂